Thursday, March 25, 2010

Not again. S'pore is really damaging her reputation

You can start reading the article discussed first.

What are some of the characteristics of a 1st world, liberal and politically stable country? Let's see, high GDP (check), safe (check), online freedom (check.. in a way), media freedom (er, half check), diverse choices of education (a stronger check compared to 5 years ago), does not sue newspapers for saying ugly stuff about the government (no check). The checks are in relation to Singapore.

For the record, let's think why Singapore sued NYT. Firstly, NYT is a very established newspaper. People listen to them. If I started blogging about why I think PAP sucks, very few people would listen to me. Secondly, the Singapore government isn't very forgiving to people who have "misconceptions" about this beautiful country. The "libellous" article was named All in The Family. Ha, we all know what it means right? And the statement that was probably the best of all? Our current prime minister "did not achieve his position through merit".

I'm not sure how many Singaporeans would support Singapore's suing actions. Among the Singaporeans who do or do not support, I also wonder what the demographics are like. Age, race, religion, income, education?

In my opinion, both sides have issues mans! Let's start with NYT, is the journalist stupid or what? This is your second time being sued for the same thing! Total damages paid was $160,000, OK fair enough, small change for NYT but it's pretty embarrassing. The first time it happened, people were just shock at S'pore's reaction. Next, let's analyze what it means to Singapore. Good to know you like to stand up for your rights but people will now all the more label us as the country with the lowest press freedom and the highest suing response rate.

Do you think Singapore could have settled this issue another way?

No comments:

Post a Comment